Life in Plastic. Is it fantastic?

Group 74

Annually, 400 million tons of plastic is produced worldwide. As the world is trying to reduce its dependency on plastic, it does not seem to be reachable in the near future. What is the reason for this? What will replace plastic, would that be viable? Is it possible that plastic-phobia is exaggerated?

A world plastically deformed

Plastic use has been under intense scrutiny in the last few years with more attention being brought to the harmful effects on humans as well as the environment. The UN has gone so far as to declare a “War on Ocean Plastic”. It is estimated that  8.1 billion kilograms of plastic waste enter the ocean from coastal regions every year. A concerning aspect of this pollution is the proliferation of microplastics (plastics with a diameter of less than 5 mm) in the ecosystem. Researchers have discovered microplastics at all levels of the ocean with more fibres being found the deeper they went. These microplastics have been found to reduce reproduction in muscles and damage the liver and other organs through the plastics acting as a medium for other harmful substances to latch onto. Humans are intaking microplastics through household meals, seafood, and drinking water. While the effects of microplastics on human health are not conclusive, there is a growing body of research on the topic showcasing the numerous potential risks.

The production of plastics is also damaging to the environment. The UK and other international communities have legislation and regulations imposing limits on the levels of chemicals released to the atmosphere. Nevertheless, the are companies paying substantial amounts of money for breaking these regulations. Research published by PLOS ONE the University of Hawai’i shows that methane and ethylene, two types of  greenhouse gasses, are emitted when plastic is exposed to ambient solar radiation. These gases are not only are toxic but can reduce the quality of air and degrade the soil. Therefore, knowing about the impact of plastic in our ecosystem and ignoring it is an act of cruelty to life. In light of Kantian theory, this is unacceptable as there are strong laws against pollution to protect the population and the earth.

Additionally, plastic waste exportation to less developed countries is a large problem being faced in Asia. China, which had been importing the waste of the large plastic-producing countries such as the USA, UK and Australia for decades began to factor in the impact on their own country and its population. In 2018 they began banning nearly all of its plastic importation. This led the other countries in Asia to take on the burden with disastrous consequences. From a care ethics viewpoint which emphasises the importance of relationships and benevolence, this is morally atrocious as tensions were caused between these countries. This negatively affected their political and economic relationships and displayed a gross callousness towards the less fortunate.

The current rate of plastic use cannot be tolerated as it poses a threat to a sustainable and healthy world. Though we benefit much from plastic products, they will be our greatest abuser if we do nothing about them.

A necessary plasticity

Although, plastics are perceived as being detrimental to our world in many aspects, we should never forget that they are a large reason for our technological and industrial advancements.

The ubiquity of plastics in our modern world in just over 100 years since its discovery is a testament to its practicality in almost every industry. The diversity of its use cannot be matched by any other material that might substitute it.

The versatility of plastic materials comes from their ability to mould, laminate and to tailor them chemically and physically. The range of formulations is vast and still growing. In the near future, it is expected that a plastic suitable for almost any application will be available. This will lead to a rapid production of plastics which cannot be replaced by any cheaper material. 

Furthermore, the main source of greenhouse emissions is agriculture. This makes it imperative to reduce food waste and plastic food packaging plays a key role.

Plastic packaging is lightweight, reducing the number of trucks delivering the same amount of product. This decreases the costs, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. A study shows that if a variety of plastic packaging is replaced by its non plastic counterpart, the amount of packaging generated annually in US would increase by 55 million tons. As can be seen, the problem of greenhouse gasses associated with plastics is not as simple as it sounds. Overall, plastics help reduce greenhouse gasses and energy consumption. As most plastic substitutes are plant based, it is feared that increase in production of plastic substitutes will increase deforestation. Thus, warming and acidifying the oceans, that everybody is eager to protect.

Removing plastic from our lives will be very restrictive for our growing industry. Nearly every advancement we made, every product we invented and every process we discovered since plastics came into existence has been influenced by it. No more plastics will mean, everything affected by or created with the use of plastics will have to be rethought, redesigned and recreated by the use of other methods and materials that do not include plastics. This can inhibit, stagnate or even degrade our industrial progression for many years. Discovering plastics was not a mistake, it was just a simple material discovery that people could not know the consequences of. This does not mean it is not worthwhile to make use of it. Everybody knows that plastics are everywhere and they will stay everywhere if we want the quality of our lives to stay the same. It shows that we still need to learn to live with plastics without hurting our world and maybe plastics will allow us to discover how to make the world a better and a cleaner place in the future.

Initial Decision

According to utilitarianism, plastics should be kept in use as they are cheap, effective and popular. However it is suggested that products unnecessarily made from non-biodegradable plastic be banned. It is vital to use only recyclable plastics. New, improved mechanisms of disposal should be discovered to reduce marine pollution.

51 thoughts on “Life in Plastic. Is it fantastic?

  1. it is very important to understand the demand and supply of the uses of plastic. The economic benefits of the use of plastic is undeniably true. Therefore, the supply side which are the plastic producing countries, especially to the US, must realise and accept the increase in costs of using alternative materials, then and only then, the would can effective reduce plastic waste.

  2. Plastics are indeed very important to us, but also very deadly for the environment, and non-human organisms. Preventing people from using it could increase the quality of life by reducing the pollution resulting from its production and usage. Contrary, due to its worldwide popularity, the economy of individual countries could decrease significantly. Basically, it’s a trade off, in which we afford to lose some economic power and growth to have a better quality of life.

  3. Great article! The fact that i probably have consumed micro-plastic before, without even knowing, never crossed my mind until I read this article lol, which i think is a bit naive from my part given the ever increasing plastic pollution that is affecting the environment.
    Plastics are indeed causing a lot of damage, hence many companies are now taking actions to reduce plastic usage as much as they can. For instance, the supermarkets that charge for plastic bags in hopes that the customers use and keep their reusable bags for future purchases and also the UK plastics pact which has now more than 50 organisations in it, all working in the reduction of plastic pollution.
    However, like it was mentioned in the article, plastic is also very useful in many aspects. Therefore We can’t end plastic usage in total but we can manage to use it effectively, because i think that the reason plastic has come this far to the point that it became a problem is because entities were unnecessarily overusing it.

    1. Hello, thanks for you comment! We are glad to have given people some more insight into the invasiveness of plastics in our lives. Your final statement is definitely one we agree with and hopefully more people/organisations can do more to adopt reduction tactics.

  4. An interesing piece of article which argues for the need to continue the use of plastics. It is important for us to realise the detrimental effects of plastics and hence stick to using biodegradable plastics in order to reduce the negative impacts caused by them.

  5. Most plastic substitutes are plant based yes, however the wider issue is how we use agricultural land. If we moved from diets high in animal products to predominantly plant based diets, our land use for food production would be dramatically reduced, making it feasible to grow plenty of these plant based alternatives.

    Some of the plastic we produce is completely unnecessary e.g. plastic packaged bananas, sweet packets many times the size of the contents. These are examples of excess plastic for the sake of marginal convenience and to catch the eye respectively. I believe we need sophisticated regulations to stop companies from such uses of plastics.

  6. Although the usage of plastics causes damage to the environment, it is necessary to recognize its importance in several sectors, stop using and replace this material would increase the costs of manufacturing products, instead, I think we should invest more time in researching ways to recycle, reutilize and the disposal. We can not ignore the importance of plastics.

  7. A nicely written article, but you need to bring the ethical reasoning to the fore. If you look at the “necessary plasticity” section there seems to be little discussion over what ethical theory supports plastic’s use. You do mention utilitarianism in the conclusion, which is good.

  8. As the article clearly says plastic the usage of plastic within the industries is massive, despite of the factor that it has such a negative impact in the environment. However the biggest question that comes to when reading the article is in which ways we could reduce or replace the usage of plastic with a similar, let’s say material, without impacting so negatively the environment. I reckon, it will be extremely difficult since it’s a cheap material and does pretty well its job, plus the biggest companies will probably do not abdicate its usage and production since the costs for researching a new material to its replacement might be fairly high and is definitely not a good tactic for companies who are looking for great results within a short term.

    1. It would be great If we were able turn all plastics into bio-degradable plastics but sadly not all plastics have their bio-degradable alternatives.

  9. I agree, it would be difficult to phase out plastics all together but phasing out single use plastics is a good place to start and should not be that difficult to implement

  10. The article clearly explains the nowadays problems with plastic products. But really important was the counter argument where it was agreed that plastic is still needed in some of the industries. But still the problem remains the problem, the impact from enormous usage of plastic is tragic.

    1. Thanks for the comment! So do you you think it would be better to take more drastic measure to reduce the harmful effects of plastic on out environment and health? We’d love to hear your thoughts.

  11. The subject is well understood and explained in depth. I am glad that the necessity of plastics were covered in this article. Getting rid of all plastics does not seem to be possible in our world. The possible technological and industrial regression due to the complete ban of all plastics create an interesting ethical argument. Also, the effects of plastics on the oceans are very well researched.

  12. This has informed me very well on the dangers of misusing plastics. Currently the media portrays the uses of plastics as being dangerous to the the environment however this article portrays a balanced argument containing both sides of the argument.

  13. The article includes both the benefits and the detriments of plastics with equal significance. The side effects of the massive scale plastics productions of the modern world are written very well. Sufficient information was given about the benefits of plastics, making the ethical dilemma even stronger. Overall, the article is enjoyable to read and makes us think about the future of plastics.

  14. The article accurately and rightfully explains how the versatile uses of plastic and its many characteristics make it an irresistible and perfectly preferable material. It is also further elaborated on how plastic poses a great threat to our dear earth. The article finishes off with mentioning the unnecessary use of plastic materials and the production of non-biodegradable plastics and how we can easily improve in the regulation of these two simple problems at hand.

  15. Very good coverage of the issue, and a balanced assessment of pros and cons. It is clear that we can not go back in time and use plant based fibers, leather etc. to replace plastics. Plastics and composites are here to stay. We need more effort from governments worldwide to limit unnecessary use of plastics, to give incentives for using ecological alternatives, for recycling.

  16. Pingback: ivermectil goodrx
  17. Pingback: what is dapoxetine
  18. Pingback: prednisone uk
  19. Pingback: ivermectin liquid

Leave a Reply